Technology audit and enterprise IT consulting

A DNA Solutions audit covers four layers of your estate. First, the data layer: we map your databases, schemas, and the dependency graph between services, so the high-risk couplings and single points of failure become explicit. Second, the licensing layer: we review database, middleware, and software licensing terms against the contracts to surface vendor lock-in and recurring cost. Third, the architecture layer: we assess how the system holds under load and growth, and where it bottlenecks first. Fourth, the integration layer: how each component talks to the rest of the stack. The output is a prioritized report that documents where the costs and structural risks sit, with a sequenced path forward scoped to your existing systems rather than a generic recommendation.

Yes. Most engagements start on infrastructure built by other teams or vendors, and reading an unfamiliar system is the core of the work. Our senior engineers carry 20+ years of experience across Oracle, SAP, billing engines, and cloud platforms, gained on enterprise environments in European telecom and tolling before and during DNA Solutions. That depth is what lets us audit a system at the level of its real constraints rather than its documentation, which on legacy estates is often incomplete or out of date. We begin by inspecting the running system: schemas, integration points, licensing terms, and the coupling between components. From there we reconstruct how the architecture actually behaves, then document the structural risks and the costs that the current owners may not have visibility on.

Yes. DNA Solutions runs structured technical evaluations for ERP and CRM selection so the decision rests on how each option fits your operations rather than on a vendor pitch. We start by mapping your functional and technical requirements, then score the candidates against them: integration fit with your current stack, data migration effort, customization limits, and the total cost of ownership over the full contract term, including licensing, infrastructure, and the integration work each option implies. Because our engineers have built and integrated enterprise systems, we read vendor claims against what the platform will actually require to run in your environment. The evaluation ends with a comparison you can defend internally and an integration plan for the option you choose, so selection connects directly to the work that follows.

Consulting is the upstream step: assessment, architecture review, licensing analysis, and a prioritized roadmap. The deliverable is a decision base, so you can scope and budget what comes next before committing to a build. A full modernization project is the execution that follows, where we rebuild or migrate the systems the audit flagged. Keeping the two separate has a practical benefit: the audit can recommend doing less rather than more, and many engagements stop at the report because the priority turns out to be a few targeted fixes rather than a large program. When execution is the right call, the roadmap connects directly to our Legacy Modernization, Cloud Solutions, and Enterprise System Integration services, run by the same senior engineers who carried out the assessment, so no context is lost in the handover.